Since widespread implementation ofĮHR systems, many developments have been made to make such systems more efficient. Not only is accurateĭocumentation vital for patient safety, it is also required for reimbursement, and is often used in litigation. Record keeping and quality of records were higher than their actual experience.Ĭonclusion: We concluded that although residents found the voice recognition software to be valuable, they did not believe it increased theirĬharting Dictation Documentation Electronic health record Orthopaedic residency Voice recognition AbbreviationsĬlinical documentation is one of the most costly and time-intensive aspects of the electronic health record (EHR) system. Conversely, overall expectations for improvement in time spent on Higher for perceived value of voice recognition software than initial expectations. (20 out of 25) at four months-post, and 84% response rate (21 out of 25) at sixteen months’ post-implementation. Results: The expectations survey had an 88% response rate (22 out of 25) at pre-implementation, the experiences survey had 80% response rate The post-survey assessed resident experiences when interacting with the tool. General attitudes regarding its usefulness in practice. The pre-survey assessed resident expectations of the voice recognition software and Materials and Methods: We surveyed resident expectations of voice recognition software before introduction, and at four and sixteen monthsįollowing its implementation, inquiring about resident experience. This included adoption rate, quality of the records, workflow efficiency, as well as overall value.
Objective: Our aim was to assess the perceived value of voice recognition software on patient encounter documentation in an orthopaedic
Recognition software by medical professionals for charting is a method that could facilitate more efficient and easier recording of the medical data Introduction: Electronic health records have become a core component of managing patient care in healthcare.